Privacy paper essays

Privacy paper essays I believe law enforcement should do a better job of protecting private information from abuse. Law enforcement tells us they are tracking down more criminals with surveillance. Since the introduction of surveillance techniques the crime rate has not dropped. If law agencies observed peoples actions more responsibly, it would protect citizens without jeopardizing their privacy. Instead, law enforcement is compromising our privacy under the guise of crime prevention by using cameras, wire tapping, and the Internet. The use of cameras for the purpose of law enforcement most often does not deter criminals. Crime rates have not decreased since the introduction of cameras in public places. Some criminals, who actually desire recognition for committing a crime, are encouraged when video surveillance is being used. Strossen states, In Tempe, Arizona, officials stuck a rotating camera-nicknamed Sneaky Peak-atop the municipal building (Barnet and Bedau 681). Invasion of privacy resembling sneaky peak spying abilities are constantly going on, such as the highly ineffective camera put up in Times Square. Strossen stated, Surveillance cameras that had been mounted for 22 mounts in New York Citys Times Square led to only 10 arrest before they were dismantled... (Barnet and Badau 681). Ineffective cameras, like the one in Times Square, should be removed to guarantee the preservation of our constitutional right to privacy. If law agencies are not satisfied with camera usage, they can also use tapping techniques to hear and see everything inside or outside a house. Law enforcement agencies can easily wiretap and eavesdrop on every conversation in a citizens home. A 1994 case has made it relatively easy for law enforcement to get permission to tap our personal conversations. Simson states In 1994, Congress passed the Communications Assistance ...